<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andreas Wundsam &#187; systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wundsam.net/category/systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wundsam.net</link>
	<description>Musings on Networks, Systems and Software Engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu 10.04 lucid requires 2.6.32 &#8211; breaks XenServer, Hardy, Lenny Xen Hosts</title>
		<link>http://wundsam.net/2010/05/20/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-requires-2-6-32-excludes-xenserver-hardylenny-xen/</link>
		<comments>http://wundsam.net/2010/05/20/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-requires-2-6-32-excludes-xenserver-hardylenny-xen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wundsam.net/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re thinking about running the recently released Ubuntu 10.04 LTS &#8220;Lucid Lynx&#8221; as virtualized guest for a XEN machine hosted by Citrix&#8217;s XENServer, Ubuntu&#8217;s own Hardy 8.04LTS release, or Debian&#8217;s Lenny, don&#8217;t! As I found out the hard way &#8230; <a href="http://wundsam.net/2010/05/20/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-requires-2-6-32-excludes-xenserver-hardylenny-xen/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re thinking about running the recently released Ubuntu 10.04 LTS &#8220;Lucid Lynx&#8221; as virtualized guest for a XEN machine hosted by Citrix&#8217;s XENServer, Ubuntu&#8217;s own Hardy 8.04LTS release, or Debian&#8217;s Lenny, don&#8217;t!</p>
<p>As I found out the hard way yesterday, there is no way you can run a Lucid system with a kernel &lt;= 2.6.32. The reason is that Ubuntu&#8217;s replacement for init, upstart, recently revamped for even faster Desktop startup times, specifically its mount_all component, call experimental system calls only introduced with this kernel version. A fact that&#8217;s conveniently missing from their release document boasting about Cloud integration features.</p>
<p>Apparently it has not crossed their mind  (or they don&#8217;t care) that this excludes Lucid from a whole army of useful server deployment scenarios. For instance, Citrix&#8217; frequently used Virtualization host XENServer comes with a 2.6.18 kernel with backported drivers. Debian&#8217;s recent lenny runs 2.6.26,  even Ubuntu&#8217;s own hardy, a very stable platform as a XEN Dom0 host, runs 2.6.24. While it is possible to run differing kernels in Dom0 and DomU that&#8217;s generally considered a bad idea because of frequent incompatibilities in the past.  There&#8217;s loads of other reasons you may need an older kernel to work besides paravirtualization, e.g., specialized hardware drivers.</p>
<pre style="overflow: auto">libudev: udev_monitor_new_from_netlink: error getting socket:  Invalid argument
mountall:mountall.c:2955: Assertion failed in main:  udev_monitor = udev_monitor_new_from_netlink (udev, "udev")</pre>
<p>Obviously the design decision by Ubuntu to reduce Desktops boot times by revamping and parallelizing upstart has jeopardized its usability in many server scenarios.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s also increasingly annoying about these mishaps is the non-communication by Ubuntu. Only in the<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/516684"> launchpad discussion about this specific bug</a>, you&#8217;ll find a confirmation by an Ubuntu team member who writes &#8220;Sorry, we simply do not support earlier kernel versions. The plumbing layer is now tightly integrated with the kernel..&#8221;. This seems like a pretty important decision for a distribution seriously aiming at the server platform. One that should be discussed with the users, and prominently annouced, instead of being hidden away in a Bug discussion.</p>
<p>Maybe administrators will have to come to terms with the observation that Ubuntu is a distribution aimed exclusively at the Desktop , aiming at imitating Apple&#8217;s ease-of-use for end users, and increasingly sacrificing its Debian-inherited server friendly roots in turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wundsam.net/2010/05/20/ubuntu-10-04-lucid-requires-2-6-32-excludes-xenserver-hardylenny-xen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: wundsam.net @ 2012-02-05 23:33:38 -->
